#2794 adding tests verifying the regression, `DateTimeImmutable` should STILL...

#2794 adding tests verifying the regression, `DateTimeImmutable` should STILL work, even if unintentionally

tests/Doctrine/Tests/DBAL/Types/BaseDateTypeTestCase.php

@@ -70,6 +70,35 @@ abstract class BaseDateTypeTestCase extends PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase
         $this->assertSame($date, $this->type->convertToPHPValue($date, $this->platform));
     }
 
+    /**
+     * @group #2794
+     *
+     * Note that while DateTimeImmutable is supposed to be handled by @see \Doctrine\DBAL\Types\DateTimeImmutableType,
+     * previous DBAL versions handled it just fine. This test is just in place to prevent further regressions, even
+     * if the type is being misused
+     */
+    public function testConvertDateTimeImmutableToPHPValue()
+    {
+        $date = new \DateTimeImmutable('now');
+
+        self::assertSame($date, $this->type->convertToPHPValue($date, $this->platform));
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * @group #2794
+     *
+     * Note that while DateTimeImmutable is supposed to be handled by @see \Doctrine\DBAL\Types\DateTimeImmutableType,
+     * previous DBAL versions handled it just fine. This test is just in place to prevent further regressions, even
+     * if the type is being misused
+     */
+    public function testDateTimeImmutableConvertsToDatabaseValue()
+    {
+        self::assertInternalType(
+            'string',
+            $this->type->convertToDatabaseValue(new \DateTimeImmutable(), $this->platform)
+        );
+    }
+
     /**
      * @return mixed[][]
      */